Which is more profitable, Chubb or Marsh & McLennan Companies?

Chubb keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Chubb or Marsh & McLennan Companies?

Chubb grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Chubb or Marsh & McLennan Companies?

Chubb costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Chubb or Marsh & McLennan Companies?

Chubb would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

ChubbCBvs

Marsh & McLennan CompaniesMRSH

Chubb vs Marsh & McLennan Companies stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Chubb is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.

Side by side

	Chubb	Marsh & McLennan Companies
	$144 billion	$98.8 billion
	17.2%	15.4%
	+10.7%	+9.4%
	13.9×	23.8×
	1.1 years	2.5 years
	12.3%	14.4%
	1.2%	2.3%

Open Chubb Open Marsh & McLennan Companies

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Chubb vs Nasdaq · Chubb vs The Progressive · Chubb vs S&P Global · Chubb vs The Travelers Companies · Marsh & McLennan Companies vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · Marsh & McLennan Companies vs Mastercard · Marsh & McLennan Companies vs Moody's · Marsh & McLennan Companies vs S&P Global