Which is more profitable, Moody's or Marsh & McLennan Companies?

Moody's keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Moody's or Marsh & McLennan Companies?

Marsh & McLennan Companies grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Moody's or Marsh & McLennan Companies?

Marsh & McLennan Companies costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Moody's or Marsh & McLennan Companies?

Moody's would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Moody'sMCOvs

Marsh & McLennan CompaniesMRSH

Moody's vs Marsh & McLennan Companies stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Moody's is more profitable and has less debt. Marsh & McLennan Companies grows faster and is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	Moody's	Marsh & McLennan Companies
	$87.6 billion	$98.8 billion
	31.9%	15.4%
	+7.5%	+9.4%
	35.6×	23.8×
	1.3 years	2.5 years
	24.2%	14.4%
	0.9%	2.3%

Open Moody's Open Marsh & McLennan Companies

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Moody's vs Morgan Stanley · Moody's vs Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group · Moody's vs Nasdaq · Moody's vs Nu Holdings · Marsh & McLennan Companies vs S&P Global · Marsh & McLennan Companies vs Visa · Marsh & McLennan Companies vs Arthur J. Gallagher & · Marsh & McLennan Companies vs Aon