Which is more profitable, Applied Materials or Snowflake?

Applied Materials keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Applied Materials or Snowflake?

Snowflake grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Applied Materials or Snowflake?

Applied Materials costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Applied Materials or Snowflake?

Snowflake would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Applied MaterialsAMATvs

SnowflakeSNOW

Applied Materials vs Snowflake stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Applied Materials is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits. Snowflake grows faster and has less debt.

Side by side

	Applied Materials	Snowflake
	$294 billion	$103 billion
	24.7%	-28.4%
	+10.5%	+51.2%
	42.0×	No profit yet
	Net cash	Net cash
	28.1%	-22.6%
	0.4%	–

Open Applied Materials Open Snowflake

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Applied Materials vs Synopsys · Applied Materials vs Sony · Applied Materials vs Seagate Technology Holdings · Applied Materials vs TE Connectivity · Snowflake vs Arista Networks · Snowflake vs Broadcom · Snowflake vs Cadence Design Systems · Snowflake vs Fortinet