Which is more profitable, Applied Materials or TE Connectivity?

Applied Materials keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Applied Materials or TE Connectivity?

Applied Materials grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Applied Materials or TE Connectivity?

TE Connectivity costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Applied Materials or TE Connectivity?

Applied Materials would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Applied MaterialsAMATvs

TE ConnectivityTEL

Applied Materials vs TE Connectivity stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Applied Materials is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. TE Connectivity is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	Applied Materials	TE Connectivity
	$294 billion	$62.0 billion
	24.7%	16.4%
	+10.5%	+5.9%
	42.0×	19.1×
	Net cash	0.8 years
	28.1%	13.3%
	0.4%	1.4%

Open Applied Materials Open TE Connectivity

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Applied Materials vs TSMC · Applied Materials vs Texas Instruments · Applied Materials vs Uber · Applied Materials vs Western Digital · TE Connectivity vs Arista Networks · TE Connectivity vs Broadcom · TE Connectivity vs Cadence Design Systems · TE Connectivity vs Fortinet