Which is more profitable, Applied Materials or Texas Instruments?

Texas Instruments keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Applied Materials or Texas Instruments?

Applied Materials grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Applied Materials or Texas Instruments?

Applied Materials costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Applied Materials or Texas Instruments?

Applied Materials would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Applied MaterialsAMATvs

Texas InstrumentsTXN

Applied Materials vs Texas Instruments stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Applied Materials grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Texas Instruments is more profitable.

Side by side

	Applied Materials	Texas Instruments
	$294 billion	$277 billion
	24.7%	28.3%
	+10.5%	+4.1%
	42.0×	55.5×
	Net cash	1.3 years
	28.1%	16.7%
	0.4%	1.8%

Open Applied Materials Open Texas Instruments

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Applied Materials vs Uber · Applied Materials vs Western Digital · Applied Materials vs Apple · Applied Materials vs Accenture · Texas Instruments vs Arista Networks · Texas Instruments vs Broadcom · Texas Instruments vs Cadence Design Systems · Texas Instruments vs Fortinet