Amgen vs Revolution Medicines stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Amgen is more profitable, grows faster and is cheaper for its profits. Revolution Medicines has less debt.
Side by side
| Amgen | Revolution Medicines | |
|---|---|---|
| $252 billion | $37.3 billion | |
| 21.0% | -3,768.3% | |
| +7.6% | −10.5% | |
| 32.7× | No profit yet | |
| 2.7 years | Net cash | |
| 15.0% | -50.1% | |
| 2.9% | – |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Amgen vs Thermo Fisher Scientific · Amgen vs UnitedHealth · Amgen vs AbbVie · Amgen vs Bristol-Myers Squibb · Revolution Medicines vs Gilead Sciences

