Amgen vs Bristol-Myers Squibb stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Amgen is more profitable and grows faster. Bristol-Myers Squibb is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Amgen | Bristol-Myers Squibb | |
|---|---|---|
| $252 billion | $130 billion | |
| 21.0% | 14.6% | |
| +7.6% | +2.5% | |
| 32.7× | 18.4× | |
| 2.7 years | 2.4 years | |
| 15.0% | 13.9% | |
| 2.9% | 4.4% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Amgen vs Gilead Sciences · Amgen vs Intuitive Surgical · Amgen vs Johnson & Johnson · Amgen vs Eli Lilly · Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Intuitive Surgical · Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Johnson & Johnson · Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Eli Lilly · Bristol-Myers Squibb vs McKesson

