Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Intuitive Surgical stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Bristol-Myers Squibb is cheaper for its profits. Intuitive Surgical is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt.
Side by side
| Bristol-Myers Squibb | Intuitive Surgical | |
|---|---|---|
| $130 billion | $154 billion | |
| 14.6% | 28.4% | |
| +2.5% | +18.2% | |
| 18.4× | 53.8× | |
| 2.4 years | Net cash | |
| 13.9% | 13.4% | |
| 4.4% | – |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Johnson & Johnson · Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Eli Lilly · Bristol-Myers Squibb vs McKesson · Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Medtronic · Intuitive Surgical vs Edwards Lifesciences · Intuitive Surgical vs Johnson & Johnson · Intuitive Surgical vs Eli Lilly · Intuitive Surgical vs Medtronic

