Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Medtronic stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Bristol-Myers Squibb is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Medtronic grows faster.
Side by side
| Bristol-Myers Squibb | Medtronic | |
|---|---|---|
| $130 billion | $132 billion | |
| 14.6% | 13.2% | |
| +2.5% | +3.8% | |
| 18.4× | 27.4× | |
| 2.4 years | 2.7 years | |
| 13.9% | 7.2% | |
| 4.4% | 3.5% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Novo Nordisk · Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Roche · Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Thermo Fisher Scientific · Bristol-Myers Squibb vs UnitedHealth · Medtronic vs Intuitive Surgical · Medtronic vs Johnson & Johnson · Medtronic vs Eli Lilly · Medtronic vs McKesson

