McKesson vs Medtronic stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
McKesson grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Medtronic is more profitable.
Side by side
| McKesson | Medtronic | |
|---|---|---|
| $127 billion | $132 billion | |
| 1.2% | 13.2% | |
| +11.1% | +3.8% | |
| 26.7× | 27.4× | |
| 0.6 years | 2.7 years | |
| 81.1% | 7.2% | |
| 0.4% | 3.5% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: McKesson vs Merck & · McKesson vs Roche · McKesson vs UnitedHealth · McKesson vs AbbVie · Medtronic vs Novo Nordisk · Medtronic vs Regeneron Pharmaceuticals · Medtronic vs Roche · Medtronic vs Thermo Fisher Scientific

