McKesson vs Merck & stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
McKesson grows faster and has less debt. Merck & is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| McKesson | Merck & | |
|---|---|---|
| $127 billion | $364 billion | |
| 1.2% | 28.1% | |
| +11.1% | +9.4% | |
| 26.7× | 20.0× | |
| 0.6 years | 1.2 years | |
| 81.1% | 17.8% | |
| 0.4% | 2.8% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: McKesson vs Roche · McKesson vs UnitedHealth · McKesson vs AbbVie · McKesson vs Bristol-Myers Squibb · Merck & vs Merck KGaA · Merck & vs Moderna · Merck & vs Pfizer · Merck & vs Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

