Apollo Global Management vs Mastercard stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Apollo Global Management grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Mastercard is more profitable.
Side by side
| Apollo Global Management | Mastercard | |
|---|---|---|
| $72.9 billion | $576 billion | |
| 10.9% | 45.6% | |
| +68.6% | +16.5% | |
| 20.9× | 38.5× | |
| Net cash | 0.4 years | |
| 15.6% | 58.5% | |
| 1.6% | 0.7% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Apollo Global Management vs Moody's · Apollo Global Management vs S&P Global · Apollo Global Management vs Visa · Apollo Global Management vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · Mastercard vs American Express · Mastercard vs Bank of America · Mastercard vs Brookfield Asset Management · Mastercard vs Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria

