Atlas Copco vs RTX stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Atlas Copco is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. RTX grows faster.
Side by side
| Atlas Copco | RTX | |
|---|---|---|
| SEK 938 billion | $268 billion | |
| 15.7% | 7.6% | |
| +6.0% | +9.4% | |
| 35.5× | 39.8× | |
| 0.4 years | 2.1 years | |
| 18.9% | 8.2% | |
| 1.6% | 1.5% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Atlas Copco vs SpaceX · Atlas Copco vs Caterpillar · Atlas Copco vs General Electric · Atlas Copco vs GE Aerospace · RTX vs BAE Systems · RTX vs Bloom Energy · RTX vs Caterpillar · RTX vs Cintas