BAE Systems vs RTX stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
BAE Systems grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. RTX is more profitable.
Side by side
| BAE Systems | RTX | |
|---|---|---|
| £55.1 billion | $268 billion | |
| 7.3% | 7.6% | |
| +10.1% | +9.4% | |
| 26.7× | 39.8× | |
| 1.3 years | 2.1 years | |
| 11.1% | 8.2% | |
| 1.9% | 1.5% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: BAE Systems vs SpaceX · BAE Systems vs Caterpillar · BAE Systems vs Cintas · BAE Systems vs General Electric · RTX vs Bloom Energy · RTX vs Caterpillar · RTX vs Cintas · RTX vs Delta Electronics (Thailand) Public