BAE Systems vs Caterpillar stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
BAE Systems is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Caterpillar is more profitable and grows faster.
Side by side
| BAE Systems | Caterpillar | |
|---|---|---|
| £55.1 billion | $275 billion | |
| 7.3% | 13.1% | |
| +10.1% | +10.1% | |
| 26.7× | 30.9× | |
| 1.3 years | 2.3 years | |
| 11.1% | 15.1% | |
| 1.9% | 0.7% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: BAE Systems vs Cintas · BAE Systems vs General Electric · BAE Systems vs GE Aerospace · BAE Systems vs RTX · Caterpillar vs Bloom Energy · Caterpillar vs Cummins · Caterpillar vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · Caterpillar vs Cintas

