Caterpillar vs Cummins stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Caterpillar is more profitable. Cummins grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Caterpillar | Cummins | |
|---|---|---|
| $275 billion | $61.9 billion | |
| 13.1% | 8.4% | |
| +10.1% | +11.2% | |
| 30.9× | 21.8× | |
| 2.3 years | 1.0 years | |
| 15.1% | 17.0% | |
| 0.7% | 1.2% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Caterpillar vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · Caterpillar vs Cintas · Caterpillar vs Delta Electronics (Thailand) Public · Caterpillar vs Vinci SA · Cummins vs Cintas · Cummins vs Fastenal · Cummins vs General Electric · Cummins vs GE Aerospace

