Caterpillar vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Caterpillar has less debt. Canadian Pacific Kansas City is more profitable, grows faster and is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Caterpillar | Canadian Pacific Kansas City | |
|---|---|---|
| $275 billion | $81.9 billion | |
| 13.1% | 27.5% | |
| +10.1% | +19.6% | |
| 30.9× | 28.2× | |
| 2.3 years | 2.8 years | |
| 15.1% | 7.4% | |
| 0.7% | 0.7% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Caterpillar vs Cintas · Caterpillar vs Delta Electronics (Thailand) Public · Caterpillar vs Vinci SA · Caterpillar vs DHL Group · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs CSX · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Cintas · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Eaton · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Fastenal