Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs CSX stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Canadian Pacific Kansas City is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Canadian Pacific Kansas City | CSX | |
|---|---|---|
| $81.9 billion | $95.9 billion | |
| 27.5% | 20.5% | |
| +19.6% | +5.9% | |
| 28.2× | 33.2× | |
| 2.8 years | 3.0 years | |
| 7.4% | 11.5% | |
| 0.7% | 1.2% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Cintas · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Eaton · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Fastenal · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs General Dynamics · CSX vs Cintas · CSX vs Fastenal · CSX vs Norfolk Southern · CSX vs RELX