CSX vs RELX stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
CSX grows faster. RELX is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| CSX | RELX | |
|---|---|---|
| $95.9 billion | $70.3 billion | |
| 20.5% | 21.5% | |
| +5.9% | +3.9% | |
| 33.2× | 25.8× | |
| 3.0 years | 2.1 years | |
| 11.5% | 22.0% | |
| 1.2% | 2.2% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: CSX vs Trane Technologies · CSX vs Union Pacific · CSX vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · CSX vs Cintas · RELX vs Cintas · RELX vs Deere & · RELX vs Emerson Electric · RELX vs Eaton

