CSX vs Union Pacific stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
CSX grows faster. Union Pacific is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| CSX | Union Pacific | |
|---|---|---|
| $95.9 billion | $180 billion | |
| 20.5% | 29.1% | |
| +5.9% | +4.6% | |
| 33.2× | 25.2× | |
| 3.0 years | 2.4 years | |
| 11.5% | 16.5% | |
| 1.2% | 2.1% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: CSX vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · CSX vs Cintas · CSX vs Fastenal · CSX vs Norfolk Southern · Union Pacific vs Cintas · Union Pacific vs Fastenal · Union Pacific vs RELX · Union Pacific vs Trane Technologies

