Cummins vs General Electric stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Cummins is cheaper for its profits. General Electric is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt.
Side by side
| Cummins | General Electric | |
|---|---|---|
| $61.9 billion | €310 billion | |
| 8.4% | 19.0% | |
| +11.2% | +16.3% | |
| 21.8× | 39.3× | |
| 1.0 years | 0.7 years | |
| 17.0% | 19.4% | |
| 1.2% | 0.4% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Cummins vs GE Aerospace · Cummins vs RELX · Cummins vs SpaceX · Cummins vs Trane Technologies · General Electric vs Cintas · General Electric vs Deere & · General Electric vs Delta Electronics (Thailand) Public · General Electric vs Vinci SA
