Which is more profitable, Cummins or Trane Technologies?

Trane Technologies keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Cummins or Trane Technologies?

Trane Technologies grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Cummins or Trane Technologies?

Cummins costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Cummins or Trane Technologies?

Trane Technologies would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

CumminsCMIvs

Trane TechnologiesTT

Cummins vs Trane Technologies stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Cummins is cheaper for its profits. Trane Technologies is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt.

Side by side

	Cummins	Trane Technologies
	$61.9 billion	$91.5 billion
	8.4%	13.7%
	+11.2%	+11.4%
	21.8×	31.3×
	1.0 years	0.7 years
	17.0%	24.0%
	1.2%	0.9%

Open Cummins Open Trane Technologies

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Cummins vs BWX Technologies · Cummins vs Caterpillar · Cummins vs Cintas · Cummins vs Fastenal · Trane Technologies vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · Trane Technologies vs CSX · Trane Technologies vs Cintas · Trane Technologies vs Deere &