Cummins vs RELX stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Cummins grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. RELX is more profitable.
Side by side
| Cummins | RELX | |
|---|---|---|
| $61.9 billion | $70.3 billion | |
| 8.4% | 21.5% | |
| +11.2% | +3.9% | |
| 21.8× | 25.8× | |
| 1.0 years | 2.1 years | |
| 17.0% | 22.0% | |
| 1.2% | 2.2% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Cummins vs SpaceX · Cummins vs Trane Technologies · Cummins vs BWX Technologies · Cummins vs Caterpillar · RELX vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · RELX vs CSX · RELX vs Cintas · RELX vs Deere &

