Cummins vs GE Aerospace stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Cummins grows faster and is cheaper for its profits. GE Aerospace is more profitable and has less debt.
Side by side
| Cummins | GE Aerospace | |
|---|---|---|
| $61.9 billion | $343 billion | |
| 8.4% | 19.0% | |
| +11.2% | −9.6% | |
| 21.8× | 39.4× | |
| 1.0 years | 0.7 years | |
| 17.0% | 22.4% | |
| 1.2% | 0.5% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Cummins vs RELX · Cummins vs SpaceX · Cummins vs Trane Technologies · Cummins vs BWX Technologies · GE Aerospace vs Cintas · GE Aerospace vs Deere & · GE Aerospace vs Delta Electronics (Thailand) Public · GE Aerospace vs Vinci SA

