Barrick Mining vs Freeport-McMoRan stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Barrick Mining is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Barrick Mining | Freeport-McMoRan | |
|---|---|---|
| $61.2 billion | $85.0 billion | |
| 29.4% | 8.5% | |
| +15.5% | +12.8% | |
| 12.3× | 38.6× | |
| Net cash | 0.7 years | |
| 23.4% | 18.6% | |
| 2.1% | 0.9% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Barrick Mining vs Linde · Barrick Mining vs Newmont · Barrick Mining vs Rio Tinto Group · Barrick Mining vs Rio Tinto Group · Freeport-McMoRan vs BHP Group · Freeport-McMoRan vs Linde · Freeport-McMoRan vs Newmont · Freeport-McMoRan vs Rio Tinto Group

