Barrick Mining vs Rio Tinto Group stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Barrick Mining is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Barrick Mining | Rio Tinto Group | |
|---|---|---|
| $61.2 billion | £102 billion | |
| 29.4% | 17.3% | |
| +15.5% | +1.2% | |
| 12.3× | 13.6× | |
| Net cash | 0.7 years | |
| 23.4% | 14.3% | |
| 2.1% | 4.5% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Barrick Mining vs Southern Copper · Barrick Mining vs Agnico Eagle Mines · Barrick Mining vs BHP Group · Barrick Mining vs Freeport-McMoRan · Rio Tinto Group vs BHP Group · Rio Tinto Group vs CRH · Rio Tinto Group vs Ecolab · Rio Tinto Group vs Freeport-McMoRan

