CRH vs Rio Tinto Group stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
CRH grows faster. Rio Tinto Group is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| CRH | Rio Tinto Group | |
|---|---|---|
| $62.0 billion | £102 billion | |
| 10.0% | 17.3% | |
| +6.4% | +1.2% | |
| 16.6× | 13.6× | |
| 1.5 years | 0.7 years | |
| 11.4% | 14.3% | |
| 1.5% | 4.5% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: CRH vs Southern Copper · CRH vs Amrize · CRH vs BHP Group · CRH vs Linde · Rio Tinto Group vs Ecolab · Rio Tinto Group vs Freeport-McMoRan · Rio Tinto Group vs Linde · Rio Tinto Group vs Newmont

