Freeport-McMoRan vs Rio Tinto Group stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Freeport-McMoRan grows faster. Rio Tinto Group is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Freeport-McMoRan | Rio Tinto Group | |
|---|---|---|
| $85.0 billion | £102 billion | |
| 8.5% | 17.3% | |
| +12.8% | +1.2% | |
| 38.6× | 13.6× | |
| 0.7 years | 0.7 years | |
| 18.6% | 14.3% | |
| 0.9% | 4.5% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Freeport-McMoRan vs Southern Copper · Freeport-McMoRan vs Agnico Eagle Mines · Freeport-McMoRan vs Barrick Mining · Freeport-McMoRan vs BHP Group · Rio Tinto Group vs Linde · Rio Tinto Group vs Newmont · Rio Tinto Group vs Rio Tinto Group · Rio Tinto Group vs Southern Copper

