Brookfield Asset Management vs KKR & stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Brookfield Asset Management is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. KKR & grows faster.
Side by side
| Brookfield Asset Management | KKR & | |
|---|---|---|
| $82.3 billion | $90.0 billion | |
| 53.9% | 12.3% | |
| +11.4% | +35.3% | |
| 33.1× | 38.0× | |
| 0.6 years | 4.6 years | |
| 22.0% | 9.6% | |
| 3.8% | 0.8% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Brookfield Asset Management vs Mastercard · Brookfield Asset Management vs Moody's · Brookfield Asset Management vs S&P Global · Brookfield Asset Management vs Visa · KKR & vs Blackstone · KKR & vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · KKR & vs Mastercard · KKR & vs Moody's

