British American Tobacco p.l.c. vs Monster Beverage stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
British American Tobacco p.l.c. is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits. Monster Beverage grows faster and has less debt.
Side by side
| British American Tobacco p.l.c. | Monster Beverage | |
|---|---|---|
| $133 billion | $90.9 billion | |
| 30.3% | 23.0% | |
| −2.5% | +12.5% | |
| 13.0× | 47.7× | |
| 2.2 years | Net cash | |
| 11.5% | 23.7% | |
| 5.2% | – |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: British American Tobacco p.l.c. vs Altria Group · British American Tobacco p.l.c. vs Philip Morris International · British American Tobacco p.l.c. vs Unilever · British American Tobacco p.l.c. vs Walmart · Monster Beverage vs Colgate-Palmolive · Monster Beverage vs Costco · Monster Beverage vs Coca-Cola · Monster Beverage vs Mondelez International

