Colgate-Palmolive vs Monster Beverage stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Colgate-Palmolive is cheaper for its profits. Monster Beverage is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt.
Side by side
| Colgate-Palmolive | Monster Beverage | |
|---|---|---|
| $79.2 billion | $90.9 billion | |
| 10.5% | 23.0% | |
| +4.4% | +12.5% | |
| 37.2× | 47.7× | |
| 1.8 years | Net cash | |
| 31.3% | 23.7% | |
| 2.3% | – |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Colgate-Palmolive vs Altria Group · Colgate-Palmolive vs PepsiCo · Colgate-Palmolive vs Procter & Gamble · Colgate-Palmolive vs Philip Morris International · Monster Beverage vs Costco · Monster Beverage vs Coca-Cola · Monster Beverage vs Mondelez International · Monster Beverage vs Altria Group

