Colgate-Palmolive vs PepsiCo stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Colgate-Palmolive is more profitable and has less debt. PepsiCo grows faster and is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Colgate-Palmolive | PepsiCo | |
|---|---|---|
| $79.2 billion | $198 billion | |
| 10.5% | 8.8% | |
| +4.4% | +5.9% | |
| 37.2× | 24.1× | |
| 1.8 years | 2.6 years | |
| 31.3% | 13.1% | |
| 2.3% | 3.9% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Colgate-Palmolive vs Procter & Gamble · Colgate-Palmolive vs Philip Morris International · Colgate-Palmolive vs Target · Colgate-Palmolive vs Unilever · PepsiCo vs Costco · PepsiCo vs Keurig Dr Pepper · PepsiCo vs Coca-Cola · PepsiCo vs Mondelez International

