Colgate-Palmolive vs Target stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Colgate-Palmolive is more profitable and grows faster. Target is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Colgate-Palmolive | Target | |
|---|---|---|
| $79.2 billion | $73.3 billion | |
| 10.5% | 3.5% | |
| +4.4% | +2.3% | |
| 37.2× | 19.8× | |
| 1.8 years | 1.8 years | |
| 31.3% | 11.6% | |
| 2.3% | 3.7% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Colgate-Palmolive vs Unilever · Colgate-Palmolive vs Walmart · Colgate-Palmolive vs British American Tobacco p.l.c. · Colgate-Palmolive vs Costco · Target vs Costco · Target vs Coca-Cola · Target vs Mondelez International · Target vs Monster Beverage

