Coca-Cola vs Target stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Coca-Cola is more profitable and grows faster. Target is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Coca-Cola | Target | |
|---|---|---|
| $427 billion | $73.3 billion | |
| 27.3% | 3.5% | |
| +7.7% | +2.3% | |
| 32.6× | 19.8× | |
| 1.9 years | 1.8 years | |
| 18.4% | 11.6% | |
| 2.6% | 3.7% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Coca-Cola vs Unilever · Coca-Cola vs Walmart · Coca-Cola vs British American Tobacco p.l.c. · Coca-Cola vs Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV · Target vs Mondelez International · Target vs Monster Beverage · Target vs Altria Group · Target vs PepsiCo

