Monster Beverage vs Target stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Monster Beverage is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. Target is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Monster Beverage | Target | |
|---|---|---|
| $90.9 billion | $73.3 billion | |
| 23.0% | 3.5% | |
| +12.5% | +2.3% | |
| 47.7× | 19.8× | |
| Net cash | 1.8 years | |
| 23.7% | 11.6% | |
| – | 3.7% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Monster Beverage vs Unilever · Monster Beverage vs Walmart · Monster Beverage vs British American Tobacco p.l.c. · Monster Beverage vs Colgate-Palmolive · Target vs Altria Group · Target vs PepsiCo · Target vs Procter & Gamble · Target vs Philip Morris International

