Procter & Gamble vs Target stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Procter & Gamble is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. Target is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Procter & Gamble | Target | |
|---|---|---|
| $394 billion | $73.3 billion | |
| 18.4% | 3.5% | |
| +2.7% | +2.3% | |
| 24.5× | 19.8× | |
| 1.0 years | 1.8 years | |
| 19.3% | 11.6% | |
| 2.9% | 3.7% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Procter & Gamble vs Unilever · Procter & Gamble vs Walmart · Procter & Gamble vs Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV · Procter & Gamble vs Church & Dwight · Target vs Philip Morris International · Target vs Unilever · Target vs Walmart · Target vs Colgate-Palmolive