Philip Morris International vs Target stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Philip Morris International is more profitable and grows faster. Target is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Philip Morris International | Target | |
|---|---|---|
| $310 billion | $73.3 billion | |
| 27.9% | 3.5% | |
| +7.2% | +2.3% | |
| 27.3× | 19.8× | |
| 2.5 years | 1.8 years | |
| 32.3% | 11.6% | |
| 3.2% | 3.7% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Philip Morris International vs Unilever · Philip Morris International vs Walmart · Philip Morris International vs British American Tobacco p.l.c. · Philip Morris International vs Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV · Target vs Unilever · Target vs Walmart · Target vs Colgate-Palmolive · Target vs Costco

