British American Tobacco p.l.c. vs Colgate-Palmolive stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
British American Tobacco p.l.c. is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits. Colgate-Palmolive grows faster and has less debt.
Side by side
| British American Tobacco p.l.c. | Colgate-Palmolive | |
|---|---|---|
| $133 billion | $79.2 billion | |
| 30.3% | 10.5% | |
| −2.5% | +4.4% | |
| 13.0× | 37.2× | |
| 2.2 years | 1.8 years | |
| 11.5% | 31.3% | |
| 5.2% | 2.3% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: British American Tobacco p.l.c. vs Costco · British American Tobacco p.l.c. vs Coca-Cola · British American Tobacco p.l.c. vs Monster Beverage · British American Tobacco p.l.c. vs Altria Group · Colgate-Palmolive vs Costco · Colgate-Palmolive vs Coca-Cola · Colgate-Palmolive vs Mondelez International · Colgate-Palmolive vs Monster Beverage

