CME Group vs S&P Global stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
CME Group is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. S&P Global grows faster.
Side by side
| CME Group | S&P Global | |
|---|---|---|
| $114 billion | $137 billion | |
| 62.5% | 29.2% | |
| +6.0% | +15.6% | |
| 27.9× | 30.7× | |
| Net cash | 1.5 years | |
| 13.9% | 11.8% | |
| 4.0% | 0.9% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: CME Group vs Visa · CME Group vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · CME Group vs Intercontinental Exchange · CME Group vs JPMorgan Chase · S&P Global vs Capital One Financial · S&P Global vs Deutsche Bank · S&P Global vs Equifax · S&P Global vs Robinhood Markets

