Canadian Natural Resources vs ONEOK stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Canadian Natural Resources is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. ONEOK grows faster.
Side by side
| Canadian Natural Resources | ONEOK | |
|---|---|---|
| $101 billion | $56.6 billion | |
| 24.5% | 10.1% | |
| −3.7% | +31.5% | |
| 13.4× | 16.7× | |
| 0.7 years | 4.2 years | |
| 19.0% | 9.2% | |
| 3.4% | 4.5% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Canadian Natural Resources vs Phillips 66 · Canadian Natural Resources vs Targa Resources · Canadian Natural Resources vs TotalEnergies · Canadian Natural Resources vs The Williams Companies · ONEOK vs Chevron · ONEOK vs Enbridge · ONEOK vs EOG Resources · ONEOK vs MPLX LP

