Which is more profitable, Energy Transfer LP or Exxon Mobil?

Exxon Mobil keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Energy Transfer LP or Exxon Mobil?

Energy Transfer LP grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Energy Transfer LP or Exxon Mobil?

Energy Transfer LP costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Energy Transfer LP or Exxon Mobil?

Exxon Mobil would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Energy Transfer LPETvs

Exxon MobilXOM

Energy Transfer LP vs Exxon Mobil stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Energy Transfer LP grows faster and is cheaper for its profits. Exxon Mobil is more profitable and has less debt.

Side by side

	Energy Transfer LP	Exxon Mobil
	$66.8 billion	$696 billion
	5.2%	8.9%
	+17.0%	−6.7%
	15.1×	24.1×
	4.5 years	0.5 years
	11.0%	13.1%
	6.8%	2.8%

Open Energy Transfer LP Open Exxon Mobil

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Energy Transfer LP vs Canadian Natural Resources · Energy Transfer LP vs Chevron · Energy Transfer LP vs Enbridge · Energy Transfer LP vs EOG Resources · Exxon Mobil vs Imperial Oil · Exxon Mobil vs Kinder Morgan · Exxon Mobil vs Cheniere Energy · Exxon Mobil vs Marathon Petroleum