Chevron vs Energy Transfer LP stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Chevron is more profitable and has less debt. Energy Transfer LP grows faster and is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Chevron | Energy Transfer LP | |
|---|---|---|
| $429 billion | $66.8 billion | |
| 6.7% | 5.2% | |
| +14.3% | +17.0% | |
| 34.9× | 15.1× | |
| 0.8 years | 4.5 years | |
| 7.5% | 11.0% | |
| 3.8% | 6.8% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Chevron vs Diamondback Energy · Chevron vs Kinder Morgan · Chevron vs Marathon Petroleum · Chevron vs MPLX LP · Energy Transfer LP vs Enbridge · Energy Transfer LP vs EOG Resources · Energy Transfer LP vs MPLX LP · Energy Transfer LP vs Exxon Mobil

