Which is more profitable, Energy Transfer LP or MPLX LP?

MPLX LP keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Energy Transfer LP or MPLX LP?

Energy Transfer LP grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Energy Transfer LP or MPLX LP?

MPLX LP costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Energy Transfer LP or MPLX LP?

MPLX LP would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Energy Transfer LPETvs

MPLX LPMPLX

Energy Transfer LP vs MPLX LP stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Energy Transfer LP grows faster. MPLX LP is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.

Side by side

	Energy Transfer LP	MPLX LP
	$66.8 billion	$58.0 billion
	5.2%	42.8%
	+17.0%	+2.9%
	15.1×	11.8×
	4.5 years	3.3 years
	11.0%	18.5%
	6.8%	7.5%

Open Energy Transfer LP Open MPLX LP

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Energy Transfer LP vs Exxon Mobil · Energy Transfer LP vs Canadian Natural Resources · Energy Transfer LP vs Chevron · Energy Transfer LP vs Enbridge · MPLX LP vs Diamondback Energy · MPLX LP vs Imperial Oil · MPLX LP vs Cheniere Energy · MPLX LP vs ONEOK