Fastenal vs The Sherwin-Williams stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Fastenal is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. The Sherwin-Williams is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Fastenal | The Sherwin-Williams | |
|---|---|---|
| $63.3 billion | $84.5 billion | |
| 15.3% | 10.9% | |
| +7.7% | +5.1% | |
| 50.3× | 32.9× | |
| 0.1 years | 2.8 years | |
| 28.8% | 17.6% | |
| 2.1% | 1.0% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Fastenal vs SpaceX · Fastenal vs TransDigm Group · Fastenal vs Tractor Supply · Fastenal vs Trane Technologies · The Sherwin-Williams vs Linde · The Sherwin-Williams vs Rio Tinto Group · The Sherwin-Williams vs Southern Copper · The Sherwin-Williams vs Tractor Supply

