Stock comparison
The Sherwin-Williams
Tractor Supply
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams
Market cap
$76.25B
Sector
Materials
TSCO
Tractor Supply
Market cap
$15.99B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
Overall winner
The Sherwin-Williams SHW
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | SHW | TSCO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 53C | 49D | SHW |
| Benjamin Graham | 75B | 66B | SHW |
| Philip Fisher | 49D | 26F | SHW |
| Peter Lynch | 63C | 56C | SHW |
| Joel Greenblatt | 42D | 32F | SHW |
| Charlie Munger | 56C | 39D | SHW |
| Terry Smith | 50C | 30F | SHW |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | SHW | TSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $76.25B | $15.99B |
| P/E (TTM) | 29.2x | 14.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 23.6x | 15.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 13.74% | 12.34% |
| Gross margin | 49.12% | 32.46% |
| Net margin | 10.86% | 6.91% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 4.27% | 5.08% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 9.96% | 4.47% |
| Debt / Equity | 3.1x | 2.5x |
| Dividend yield | 1.03% | 3.05% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
SHW leads on
- Market cap$76.25Bvs $15.99B+79%
- EPS CAGR 5y9.96%vs 4.47%+55%
- Net margin10.86%vs 6.91%+36%
- Gross margin49.12%vs 32.46%+34%
TSCO leads on
- Dividend yield3.05%vs 1.03%+66%
- P/E (TTM)14.8xvs 29.2x+49%
- EV/EBIT15.1xvs 23.6x+36%
- Debt / Equity2.5xvs 3.1x+18%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.