The Sherwin-Williams vs Tractor Supply stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
The Sherwin-Williams is more profitable and has less debt. Tractor Supply grows faster and is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| The Sherwin-Williams | Tractor Supply | |
|---|---|---|
| $84.5 billion | $18.9 billion | |
| 10.9% | 7.1% | |
| +5.1% | +7.9% | |
| 32.9× | 17.2× | |
| 2.8 years | 3.2 years | |
| 17.6% | 12.3% | |
| 1.0% | 3.1% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: The Sherwin-Williams vs Agnico Eagle Mines · The Sherwin-Williams vs BHP Group · The Sherwin-Williams vs Fastenal · The Sherwin-Williams vs Linde · Tractor Supply vs Fastenal

