Fortinet vs Monolithic Power Systems stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Fortinet is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits. Monolithic Power Systems grows faster and has less debt.
Side by side
| Fortinet | Monolithic Power Systems | |
|---|---|---|
| $93.5 billion | $67.8 billion | |
| 27.3% | 22.3% | |
| +21.3% | +27.0% | |
| 50.4× | 109.1× | |
| Net cash | Net cash | |
| 83.5% | 16.6% | |
| – | 0.4% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Fortinet vs Marvell Technology · Fortinet vs Microsoft · Fortinet vs Motorola Solutions · Fortinet vs Strategy · Monolithic Power Systems vs Intuit · Monolithic Power Systems vs KLA · Monolithic Power Systems vs Lam Research · Monolithic Power Systems vs Microsoft

