General Dynamics vs United Rentals stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
General Dynamics is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. United Rentals is more profitable and grows faster.
Side by side
| General Dynamics | United Rentals | |
|---|---|---|
| $98.2 billion | $69.6 billion | |
| 8.0% | 15.5% | |
| +6.7% | +13.5% | |
| 23.3× | 27.9× | |
| 1.2 years | 2.1 years | |
| 12.6% | 13.3% | |
| 1.7% | 0.8% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: General Dynamics vs Automatic Data Processing · General Dynamics vs Ametek · General Dynamics vs Caterpillar · General Dynamics vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · United Rentals vs W.W. Grainger · United Rentals vs Honeywell International · United Rentals vs Illinois Tool Works · United Rentals vs Parker-Hannifin