Parker-Hannifin vs United Rentals stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Parker-Hannifin is more profitable and has less debt. United Rentals grows faster and is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Parker-Hannifin | United Rentals | |
|---|---|---|
| $121 billion | $69.6 billion | |
| 17.0% | 15.5% | |
| +8.4% | +13.5% | |
| 33.0× | 27.9× | |
| 1.4 years | 2.1 years | |
| 16.8% | 13.3% | |
| 0.9% | 0.8% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Parker-Hannifin vs Ametek · Parker-Hannifin vs Caterpillar · Parker-Hannifin vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · Parker-Hannifin vs Cintas · United Rentals vs RELX · United Rentals vs Trane Technologies · United Rentals vs United Parcel Service · United Rentals vs Automatic Data Processing