Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Parker-Hannifin stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Canadian Pacific Kansas City is more profitable, grows faster and is cheaper for its profits. Parker-Hannifin has less debt.
Side by side
| Canadian Pacific Kansas City | Parker-Hannifin | |
|---|---|---|
| $81.9 billion | $121 billion | |
| 27.5% | 17.0% | |
| +19.6% | +8.4% | |
| 28.2× | 33.0× | |
| 2.8 years | 1.4 years | |
| 7.4% | 16.8% | |
| 0.7% | 0.9% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs RELX · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Trane Technologies · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Union Pacific · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs United Parcel Service · Parker-Hannifin vs Cintas · Parker-Hannifin vs Fastenal · Parker-Hannifin vs General Dynamics · Parker-Hannifin vs GE Aerospace