Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs United Parcel Service stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Canadian Pacific Kansas City is more profitable and grows faster. United Parcel Service is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Canadian Pacific Kansas City | United Parcel Service | |
|---|---|---|
| $81.9 billion | $95.7 billion | |
| 27.5% | 6.3% | |
| +19.6% | +0.9% | |
| 28.2× | 17.2× | |
| 2.8 years | 1.9 years | |
| 7.4% | 14.8% | |
| 0.7% | 6.2% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs United Rentals · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Automatic Data Processing · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Ametek · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Caterpillar · United Parcel Service vs Cintas · United Parcel Service vs Eaton · United Parcel Service vs Fastenal · United Parcel Service vs FedEx